It’s no secret that while it is critical for an organization to have a strong cybersecurity posture, it’s just as important for their third parties to have a strong security posture as well. While this fact is becoming increasingly more acknowledged in the business world (as many companies suffer data breaches at the hands of their suppliers), there are still several misconceptions about third-party risk management (TPRM) programs and what they entail. Among the many initiatives that make up a modern enterprise cybersecurity program, TPRM might be the most misunderstood.
In this three-part blog series, we’ll take a look at some of the notions surrounding third-party risk management and separate fact from fiction.
1) Third-party risk management is only necessary for companies with hundreds or thousands of third party relationships.
It just takes one of your third parties to cause a breach. Nearly every organization is reliant on a third-party for some type of service. If immediate third parties do not pose cyber risk directly, their third parties (your fourth parties) may. Organizations need to ensure they are tracking the entire flow of their data and monitoring organizations across these flows. Security ratings allow you to deliver timely, data-driven insights into any vendor’s security performance by continuously analyzing, and monitoring companies’ cybersecurity, all from the outside. Security ratings are generated on a daily basis, giving organizations continuous visibility into the security posture of key business partners.
2) Compliance should be the primary goal of any third-party risk management program.
Compliance should be one goal of your third-party risk management program, but not necessarily the primary goal. Many industries and governments regulate third-party risk management, but maintaining compliance doesn’t ensure the safety of your company’s data. It's critical to align third-party risk management strategy or programs with increasing global and regional cybersecurity regulations (i.e. GDPR, NYDFS) and business initiatives. Ongoing and continuous monitoring is a key step towards aligning third-party risk management strategy to cybersecurity regulations.
Security ratings can serve as a critical piece of your TPRM program by helping security and risk teams go above and beyond to quickly identify critical third parties, efficiently scale their TPRM programs, and provide a means to collaborate with those third parties and remediate security issues efficiently.
3) Third-party risk management should be a Board-level initiative.
TPRM is no longer just a responsibility for IT departments. A successful third-party risk management program has sponsorship from multiple departments, as well as support and involvement from the Board. In fact, Gartner estimates that by 2020, 75% of Fortune Global 500 companies will treat vendor risk management as a Board-level initiative.
If you’re using a “one-size fits all” approach to managing your vendor lifecycle, you are missing opportunities to save money and operate more efficiently. Vendor management efficiencies don’t end in the onboarding stage: using a...
If you’re experiencing frustrating delays and procedural roadblocks during your vendor management process, you’re not alone. Security managers are seeing an increase in the number of third-parties integrating with their business, and ...
During this dynamic and stressful workplace environment 2020 has brought us, finding the most efficient ways to perform in your job has never been more important. When it comes to managing your vendor lifecycle, there are three ways you...