Questionnaires have been a key part of third-party risk management programs for decades. And, until recently, they were the primary way businesses checked up on the cybersecurity performance of their third-party vendors.
But recent history has taught us that these questionnaires aren't necessarily the best tool for third-party risk management, and may in fact be lulling risk professionals into a false sense of security.
According to a recent Ponemon Institute study, 59% of companies have experienced a data breach caused by a third party. Among this majority, it's safe to assume some portion are using third-party risk assessment questionnaires.
The problem is that questionnaires only provide a small amount of visibility into cyber risk. And in a world where third-party ecosystems are getting larger and more connected, that's a big problem.
Here are a handful of ways questionnaires leave organizations vulnerable:
Security questionnaires only reflect one point in time.
In other words, security questionnaires only provide reliable information in the moment they are answered.
Organizations change. They change management, which changes risk tolerance; they cut security and regulatory compliance policies, which changes security and compliance posture. They deploy new technologies, and that also changes their risk posture.
And while the organization's security practices are changing, the threats are too. Good security controls are only good so long as they protect the organization against known threats. When new threats emerge in the time between assessments, that can leave a previously secure organization exposed.