Security performance management (SPM) helps security and risk leaders take a risk-based, outcome-driven approach to assessing and managing the performance of their organization’s cybersecurity program. With SPM, security leaders can continuously monitor and assess their organization’s current security state, analyze how security performance ranks against industry and peers, and create improvement plans that reduce cyber risk.
SPM offers many tangible benefits. It drives accountability for security outcomes throughout the organization, helps align investments and actions with the highest measurable impact over time, and enables security and risk leaders to efficiently allocate limited resources on the most critical areas of cyber risk. It also breaks down communication barriers and facilitates easily understandable, data-driven conversations with the C-suite and Board.
Why cyber security performance management?
Cybersecurity is a top challenge for executives and Board members who want to be sure their organization is doing its best to avoid compromises and attacks.
The stakes are high. A cybersecurity incident can result in the loss of intellectual property and customer data, reputational damage, and significant financial harm. Because of these risks, organizations are being held increasingly accountable for their security practices, outcomes, and failures.
Yet, building defenses and protecting endpoints is no longer enough. Organizations need to be able to quantify the impact and effectiveness of their security investments and identify gaps in security performance. They must also set goals and make informed decisions to better manage the effectiveness of their tools, technologies, and people.
Security performance management helps companies address these challenges efficiently and effectively.
The case for cyber security performance management
Until recently cyber risk management has taken a traditional route. Organizations have relied on penetration testing and threat intelligence--complemented by occasional audits and security assessments--to determine risk levels. While beneficial, these approaches only offer point-in-time operational metrics, not a continuous view of how security programs are performing.