Economic pressures have been leading to greater budget scrutiny and justification of resources for cybersecurity teams. Boards are asking harder questions around cyber risk and exposure. Not only are CISOs working hard to justify and measure their program, they’ve had to become more data-driven in the way they align investments towards company outcomes and business objectives. And they’re doing it all amidst an unstable economy, a fluctuating business environment, and a rapidly expanding threat and technology landscape—with the introduction of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Quantum Computing.
As economic pressures continue to increase, cybersecurity leaders are expected to work more strategically with their resources and look at the ROI of their technology investments to get the most out of their solutions. When tackling the strategy around budget scrutiny and technology consolidations, CISOs need to pay attention to three key areas when choosing which solutions to continue investing in, or how to work differently with what they have.
3 Efficiencies to Watch for When Consolidating Technology
The board of directors and key stakeholders are putting CISOs under greater scrutiny, and not just with cyber risk outcomes. It isn’t just about CISOs needing to pull back on new software and services they may find valuable to their tech stack. It’s also about potentially pulling out on software renewals that may not be fitting the bill, or using a solution they already have that provides similar capabilities and features.
As CISOs look to consolidate technology, there are three efficiencies to consider:
- Data efficiencies. When using multiple solutions, sometimes the data outputs don’t match up. For example, if a team is using one product for their governance and security analytics purposes, and another product to manage their attack surface, the data feeding into each might not completely align. This discrepancy puts CISOs in a tough predicament when sharing insights and results with the board or stakeholders. But if the same tool covers use cases for governance and external exposure, all the data concepts and outputs will be familiar to the stakeholders.
- Operational efficiencies. When a cybersecurity team is operationalizing their processes with vendors and technologies, some of the tools may have multiple capabilities they aren’t utilizing. If CISOs can consolidate capabilities spread throughout multiple tools into one (or even a few), then the corresponding processes become much easier to manage.
- Cost efficiencies. This goes without saying, but the easiest way to save on cost is to avoid investing in multiple tools when one can do the capabilities of several. Also consider that investing in fewer tools alleviates costs with training and onboarding, maintenance, and management.