On August 24, 1992, Hurricane Andrew devastated South Florida and Louisiana, leaving a trail of destruction in its path. The estimated payout from insurance claims totaled $15.5 billion ($26.4 billion in 2015 dollars). Due to the overwhelming number of claims filed, 11 insurance companies went bankrupt and some reports show that if the path of the storm had directly crossed Miami, the entire insurance industry could have collapsed. As a result of the massive tragedy, the insurance industry restructured their approach to risk modeling and began to focus on aggregate risk.
Adapting to New Risks
To ensure their success, insurance companies began to monitor whether a common set of threats affected a large portion of their portfolio of businesses. This type of aggregate risk modeling has helped insurance groups to anticipate the amount of capital they need to cover their insureds’ claims in case there is a major disruption. The extreme impact of natural disasters has become clear as it relates to property insurance, but another threat has come to the forefront of many risk modeling discussions: data breaches. According to the Identity Theft Resource Center (ITRC), there were 781 data breaches in 2015, which represents the second-highest number of breaches since the organization began tracking breaches ten years ago. As breaches become more common, should insurance companies focus on addressing these increasingly disruptive cyber threats? To answer this question, consider the Target breach from 2013 that led to CEO Gregg Steinhafel stepping down from his role, the company losing more than $162 million, and numerous class action lawsuits. The effects of the breach could have been more disastrous for Target, but the company received the full $90 million in coverage it had for the breach. In another example of the increasing importance of cyber policies, consider Home Depot, which experienced a data breach in 2014 and had a reported $105 million in cyber insurance to cover breaches. As more companies file claims after cyber attacks, the financial burden could become excessive for insurance groups, especially if a single breach impacts multiple organizations in the same portfolio.