CVE-2026-14457 Details
Issue summary: In a server or client configuration with RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs)
enabled, and only the private key (with no associated certificate) configured locally,
a NULL pointer dereference may occur when the remote peer solicits raw public keys and
also sends the typically omitted "signature_algorithms_cert" TLS extension.

Impact summary: The impact is limited to a possible Denial of Service as a result of
an application abort, no data disclosure or remote command execution are possible.

CWE: CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference

Description: While a passing comment in sample code in the documentation suggests
that key-only RPK configurations are supported, the best-practice RPK configuration
is to always configure a corresponding certificate (possibly self-signed or
signed by any convenient CA).

When the private key is configured along with a matching certificate, the
"signature_algorithms_cert" extension is handled reliably even without the
fix, and peer clients or servers that don't support raw public keys may be
able to complete a TLS connection by pinning or verifying the corresponding
certificate or its public key.

Deployments that prefer to configure just a private key with no certificate
need to upgrade to an updated release as noted below.

FIPS impact: no

No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the SSL protocol implementation
is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
View at NVD
Exploit prediction scoring system (EPSS) score for CVE-2026-14457
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System): EPSS predicts the likelihood that a vulnerability will be exploited in the wild. A higher percentage means a greater chance of an exploit occurring. The EPSS model produces a probability score between 0 and 1 (0 and 100%).
1.17 Probability of exploitation activity being observed over the next 30 days (67th percentile)
CVSS score for CVE-2026-14457
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System): An open framework owned and managed by FIRST.Org, Inc. that assigns a numerical score from 0 to 10 to software vulnerabilities to indicate their severity.
7.5 High
Products affected by CVE-2026-14457

CVE-2026-14457 Global Footprint

Top 10 Identified Countries

Country Observations Percentage
US 48,001 34.62%
DE 14,668 10.58%
JP 12,051 8.69%
CA 5,190 3.74%
DK 4,934 3.56%
GB 4,774 3.44%
FR 4,010 2.89%
IN 3,873 2.79%
NL 3,671 2.65%
IE 3,504 2.53%

Is CVE-2026-14457 part of your extended attack surface? Bitsight helps security leaders rapidly identify exposure and detect threats in order to prioritize, communicate, and mitigate risk.

View interactive product tours

CVE-2026-14457 Industry Footprint

Top 10 Identified Industries

*Service provider organizations (typically Technology and Telecommunications) are disproportionally represented in the results given their upstream ownership of end-user infrastructure. See our FAQs.

Industry* Observations Percentage
Technology 76,807 76.94%
Telecommunications 11,546 11.57%
Education 5,419 5.43%
Government/Politics 1,278 1.28%
Energy/Resources 1,107 1.11%
Media/Entertainment 694 0.70%
Business Services 515 0.52%
Manufacturing 394 0.39%
Finance 325 0.33%
Utilities 318 0.32%

Bitsight, the leading provider in Cyber Risk Management, introduced the next-generation internet scanner Bitsight Groma in May 2024. This technology continuously scans the entire internet to discover assets, collect asset attribution evidence, and identify an ever-growing set of security observations, such as vulnerabilities and misconfigurations. Groma’s scanning activities presently encompass:


  • 40 million-plus monitored organizations
  • 250 million-plus host names
  • 4 billion-plus routable IPv4 and IPv6 addresses

Greynoise’s recent study testifies the speed of Bitsight Groma.

Bitsight data discovery
Governance charcoal background

Bitsight TRACE team investigates security incidents and identifies vulnerabilities and threats.

View latest security research 

See what you’re up against across the expanding attack surface. Prioritize what matters most. And mitigate where you’re most vulnerable.

External Attack Surface Management