Fact or Fiction (Part 2): More Misconceptions About Third-Party Risk Management
Alex Campanelli | September 10, 2018
There are many third-party risk concepts, some of which we addressed in the first blog post of this series. While third-party risk management (TPRM) programs are becoming increasingly common for businesses, there are still some misconceptions about the elements that comprise them. In the second post of our three-part blog series, we’ll take a look at some of the notions surrounding third-party risk management programs and weed out fact from fiction.
All cybersecurity resources should be allocated towards defending one’s own network.
Your own network could be extremely secure, but without effective third-party vendor risk management, your sensitive data will still be vulnerable. Surveys indicate that many data breaches are caused by third parties — they continue to make headlines as business after business suffers compromised security at the hands of a supplier. Deloitte reports that 1 in 5 organizations has experienced a third-party breach, and 1 in 10 has lost revenue as a result. Lastly, studies show that the most expensive data breaches are the ones that originate from third parties.
A typical vendor questionnaire could be 50% shorter and just as effective.
Third-party vendor security questionnaires are a traditional security assessment method, which are often time-consuming and resource-intensive. As a result, many organizations are moving towards shared, streamlined questionnaires. By supplementing these questionnaires with continuous monitoring data like BitSight Security Ratings, customers have been able to drastically reduce the number of questions they need to ask their third parties and decrease turnaround times — making their TPRM program more efficient and effective overall.
Organizations can’t really influence their third parties’ cybersecurity practices.
Security leaders have proven that writing security obligations into contracts is one way to influence, but having frequent data-driven conversations using security ratings and assessment results can also improve vendor performance. In fact, one BitSight customer was able to improve the security posture of more than half of their vendors in just 6 months by granting them access to the BitSight platform. BitSight Security Ratings enables collaboration through consistent, data-driven security and risk conversations; it allows users to instantly share ratings with critical third parties directly in the vendor portal, fostering more effective collaboration around security to better protect company assets.
Businesses will keep investing in stronger third-party risk management programs as the need to outsource critical business functions continues. It’s important for these organizations to understand how security ratings can help proactively mitigate the risk posed by their third-party supply chain as well as facilitate collaborative relationships with their third-party vendors.
If you’re using a “one-size fits all” approach to managing your vendor lifecycle, you are missing opportunities to save money and operate more efficiently. Vendor management efficiencies don’t end in the onboarding stage: using a...
If you’re experiencing frustrating delays and procedural roadblocks during your vendor management process, you’re not alone. Security managers are seeing an increase in the number of third-parties integrating with their business, and ...
During this dynamic and stressful workplace environment 2020 has brought us, finding the most efficient ways to perform in your job has never been more important. When it comes to managing your vendor lifecycle, there are three ways you...